Category: Geo Engineering (page 3 of 8)

Sensitivity of total column ozone to stratospheric sulfur injection strategies

Tilmes, S., J.H. Richter, B. Kravitz, D.G. MacMartin, A.S. Glanville, D. Visioni, D.E. Kinnison, R. Müller (2021), “Sensitivity of total column ozone to stratospheric sulfur injection strategies”, Geophysical Research Letters, 48, e2021GL094058, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL094058

Harnessing Stratospheric Diffusion Barriers for Enhanced Climate Geoengineering

Aksamit, N.O., B. Kravitz, D.G. MacMartin, G. Haller, “Harnessing Stratospheric Diffusion Barriers for Enhanced Climate Geoengineering”, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 8845-8861, 2021.  Doi:10.5194/acp-21-8845-2021

High-latitude stratospheric aerosol geoengineering can be more effective if injection is limited to spring

Lee, Walker R., D. G. MacMartin, D. Visioni, B. Kravitz: High-latitude stratospheric aerosol geoengineering can be more effective if injection is limited to spring, Geophysical Research Letters, 48, e2021GL092696, 2021.  Doi: 10.1029/2021GL092696.

Comparing different generations of idealized solar geoengineering simulations in the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP)

Kravitz, B., MacMartin, D. G., Visioni, D., Boucher, O., Cole, J. N. S., Haywood, J., Jones, A., Lurton, T., Nabat, P., Niemeier, U., Robock, A., Séférian, R., and Tilmes, S.: Comparing different generations of idealized solar geoengineering simulations in the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 4231–4247, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-4231-2021, 2021.

Identifying the sources of uncertainty in climate model simulations of solar radiation modification with the G6sulfur and G6solar Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) simulations

Visioni, D., MacMartin, D. G., Kravitz, B., Boucher, O., Jones, A., Lurton, T., Martine, M., Mills, M. J., Nabat, P., Niemeier, U., Séférian, R., and Tilmes, S.: Identifying the sources of uncertainty in climate model simulations of solar radiation modification with the G6sulfur and G6solar Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) simulations,Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 10029-10063, 2021.  https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-10039-2021

Is Turning Down the Sun a Good Proxy for Stratospheric Sulfate Geoengineering?

Visioni, D.MacMartin, D. G., & Kravitz, B. (2021). Is turning down the sun a good proxy for stratospheric sulfate geoengineering? Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres126, e2020JD033952. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD033952

Expanding the Design Space of Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering to Include Precipitation-Based Objectives and Explore Trade-offs

Lee, W., D.G. MacMartin, D. Visioni, B. Kravitz, “Expanding the Design Space of Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering to Include Precipitation-Based Objectives and Explore Trade-offs”, Earth Syst. Dynamics, 11, 1051-1072, 2020. Doi: 10.5194/esd-11-1051-2020

Reduced poleward transport due to stratospheric heating under geoengineering

Visioni, D., D.G. MacMartin, B. Kravitz, W. Lee, I.R. Simpson and J.H. Richter, “Reduced Poleward Transport Due to Stratospheric Heating Under Stratospheric Aerosols Geoengineering”, Geophysical Research Letters47, e2020GL089470. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL089470

An update on engineering issues concerning stratospheric aerosol injection for geoengineering

Lockley, A., D.G. MacMartin, H. Hunt, “An update on engineering issues concerning stratospheric aerosol injection for geoengineering”, Environmental Research Communications, Doi: 10.1088/2515-7620/aba944

Assessing terrestrial biogeochemical feedbacks in a strategically geoengineered climate

Yang, C.-E., F. M. Hoffman, D. M. Ricciuto, S. Tilmes, L. Xia, D. G. MacMartin, B. Kravitz, J. H. Richter, M. Mills, and J. S. Fu, “Assessing terrestrial biogeochemical feedbacks in a strategically geoengineered climate”,  Environmental Research Letters, 2020.   doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/abacf7

Older posts Newer posts

© 2024 Climate Engineering

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑