All Publications
Harnessing Stratospheric Diffusion Barriers for Enhanced Climate Geoengineering
Aksamit, N.O., B. Kravitz, D.G. MacMartin, G. Haller, “Harnessing Stratospheric Diffusion Barriers for Enhanced Climate Geoengineering”, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 8845-8861, 2021. Doi:10.5194/acp-21-8845-2021
High-latitude stratospheric aerosol geoengineering can be more effective if injection is limited to spring
Lee, Walker R., D. G. MacMartin, D. Visioni, B. Kravitz: High-latitude stratospheric aerosol geoengineering can be more effective if injection is limited to spring, Geophysical Research Letters, 48, e2021GL092696, 2021. Doi: 10.1029/2021GL092696.
Comparing different generations of idealized solar geoengineering simulations in the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP)
Kravitz, B., MacMartin, D. G., Visioni, D., Boucher, O., Cole, J. N. S., Haywood, J., Jones, A., Lurton, T., Nabat, P., Niemeier, U., Robock, A., Séférian, R., and Tilmes, S.: Comparing different generations of idealized solar geoengineering simulations in the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 4231–4247, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-4231-2021, 2021.
Identifying the sources of uncertainty in climate model simulations of solar radiation modification with the G6sulfur and G6solar Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) simulations
Visioni, D., MacMartin, D. G., Kravitz, B., Boucher, O., Jones, A., Lurton, T., Martine, M., Mills, M. J., Nabat, P., Niemeier, U., Séférian, R., and Tilmes, S.: Identifying the sources of uncertainty in climate model simulations of solar radiation modification with the G6sulfur and G6solar Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) simulations,Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 10029-10063, 2021. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-10039-2021
Is Turning Down the Sun a Good Proxy for Stratospheric Sulfate Geoengineering?
, , & (2021). Is turning down the sun a good proxy for stratospheric sulfate geoengineering? Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 126, e2020JD033952. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD033952
Expanding the Design Space of Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering to Include Precipitation-Based Objectives and Explore Trade-offs
Lee, W., D.G. MacMartin, D. Visioni, B. Kravitz, “Expanding the Design Space of Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering to Include Precipitation-Based Objectives and Explore Trade-offs”, Earth Syst. Dynamics, 11, 1051-1072, 2020. Doi: 10.5194/esd-11-1051-2020
Reduced poleward transport due to stratospheric heating under geoengineering
Visioni, D., D.G. MacMartin, B. Kravitz, W. Lee, I.R. Simpson and J.H. Richter, “Reduced Poleward Transport Due to Stratospheric Heating Under Stratospheric Aerosols Geoengineering”, Geophysical Research Letters, 47, e2020GL089470. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL089470
An update on engineering issues concerning stratospheric aerosol injection for geoengineering
Lockley, A., D.G. MacMartin, H. Hunt, “An update on engineering issues concerning stratospheric aerosol injection for geoengineering”, Environmental Research Communications, Doi: 10.1088/2515-7620/aba944
Assessing terrestrial biogeochemical feedbacks in a strategically geoengineered climate
Yang, C.-E., F. M. Hoffman, D. M. Ricciuto, S. Tilmes, L. Xia, D. G. MacMartin, B. Kravitz, J. H. Richter, M. Mills, and J. S. Fu, “Assessing terrestrial biogeochemical feedbacks in a strategically geoengineered climate”, Environmental Research Letters, 2020. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/abacf7
Reaching 1.5°C and 2.0°C global surface temperature targets using stratospheric aerosol geoengineering in CMIP6
Tilmes, S., D.G. MacMartin, J.T.M. Lenaerts, L. van Kampenhout, L. Muntjewerf, L. Xia, C.S. Harrison, K.M. Krumhardt, M. J. Mills, B. Kravitz and A. Robock, “Reaching 1.5°C and 2.0°C global surface temperature targets using stratospheric aerosol geoengineering in CMIP6”, Earth System Dynamics, 11, 1-23, 2020. Doi: 10.5194/esd-11-1-2020
