All Publications
Is Turning Down the Sun a Good Proxy for Stratospheric Sulfate Geoengineering?
, , & (2021). Is turning down the sun a good proxy for stratospheric sulfate geoengineering? Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 126, e2020JD033952. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD033952
Expanding the Design Space of Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering to Include Precipitation-Based Objectives and Explore Trade-offs
Lee, W., D.G. MacMartin, D. Visioni, B. Kravitz, “Expanding the Design Space of Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering to Include Precipitation-Based Objectives and Explore Trade-offs”, Earth Syst. Dynamics, 11, 1051-1072, 2020. Doi: 10.5194/esd-11-1051-2020
Reduced poleward transport due to stratospheric heating under geoengineering
Visioni, D., D.G. MacMartin, B. Kravitz, W. Lee, I.R. Simpson and J.H. Richter, “Reduced Poleward Transport Due to Stratospheric Heating Under Stratospheric Aerosols Geoengineering”, Geophysical Research Letters, 47, e2020GL089470. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL089470
An update on engineering issues concerning stratospheric aerosol injection for geoengineering
Lockley, A., D.G. MacMartin, H. Hunt, “An update on engineering issues concerning stratospheric aerosol injection for geoengineering”, Environmental Research Communications, Doi: 10.1088/2515-7620/aba944
Assessing terrestrial biogeochemical feedbacks in a strategically geoengineered climate
Yang, C.-E., F. M. Hoffman, D. M. Ricciuto, S. Tilmes, L. Xia, D. G. MacMartin, B. Kravitz, J. H. Richter, M. Mills, and J. S. Fu, “Assessing terrestrial biogeochemical feedbacks in a strategically geoengineered climate”, Environmental Research Letters, 2020. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/abacf7
Reaching 1.5°C and 2.0°C global surface temperature targets using stratospheric aerosol geoengineering in CMIP6
Tilmes, S., D.G. MacMartin, J.T.M. Lenaerts, L. van Kampenhout, L. Muntjewerf, L. Xia, C.S. Harrison, K.M. Krumhardt, M. J. Mills, B. Kravitz and A. Robock, “Reaching 1.5°C and 2.0°C global surface temperature targets using stratospheric aerosol geoengineering in CMIP6”, Earth System Dynamics, 11, 1-23, 2020. Doi: 10.5194/esd-11-1-2020
Seasonally modulated stratospheric aerosol geoengineering alters the climate outcomes
Visioni, D., D.G. MacMartin, B. Kravitz, J.H. Richter, S. Tilmes, and M.J. Mills, “Seasonally modulated stratospheric aerosol geoengineering alters the climate outcomes”, 47, e2020GL088337. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL088337
What goes up must come down: impacts of deposition in a sulfate geoengineering scenario
Visioni, D., E. Slessarev, D.G. MacMartin, N.M. Mahowald, C.L. Goodale, and L. Xia, “What goes up must come down: impacts of deposition in a sulfate geoengineering scenario”, ERL 15(9). Doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/ab94eb
Climate econometric models indicate solar geoengineering would reduce inter-country income inequality
Harding, A.R., K. Ricke, D. Heyen, D.G. MacMartin, and J. Moreno-Cruz, “Climate econometric models indicate solar geoengineering would reduce inter-country income inequality”, Nature Communications, 11, 227, (2020). doi:10.1038/s41467-019-13957-x
Uncertainty and the basis for confidence in solar geoengineering research
Kravitz, B., and D. G. MacMartin, “Uncertainty and the basis for confidence in solar geoengineering research”, Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, Doi: 10.1038/s43017-019-0004-7
