Author: Douglas MacMartin (page 4 of 9)

Response of Surface Ultraviolet and Visible Radiation to Stratospheric SO2 Injections

Madronich, S., S. Tilmes, B. Kravitz, D.G. MacMartin, J.H. Richter, “Response of Surface Ultraviolet and Visible Radiation to Stratospheric SO2 Injections”, Atmosphere, 9(11), 432, 2018.  doi:10.3390/atmos9110432

Holistic Assessment of SO2 Injections using CESM1(WACCM): Introduction to the Special Issue

Kravitz, B., MacMartin, D.G., Tilmes, S., Richter, J.H., Mills, M.J., Lamarque, J.-F., Tribbia, J., and Large, W., “Holistic Assessment of SO2 Injections using CESM1(WACCM): Introduction to the Special Issue”, Geophys. Res. A., 123, 2018. doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029293

Persistent polar ocean warming in a strategically geoengineered climate

Fasullo, J.T., S. Tilmes, J. H. Richter, B. Kravitz, D.G. MacMartin, M.J. Mills, and I.R. Simpson, “Persistent polar ocean warming in a strategically geoengineered climate”, Nature Geoscience, 2018. doi:10.1038/s41561-018-0249-7

CESM1(WACCM) Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering Large Ensemble (GLENS) Project

Tilmes, S., J. H. Richter, B. Kravitz, D. G. MacMartin, M. J. Mills, I. Simpson, A. S. Glanville, J. T. Fasullo, A. S. Phillips, J.-F. Lamarque, J. Tribbia, J. Edwards, S. Mickelson, and S. Gosh, “CESM1(WACCM) Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering Large Ensemble (GLENS) Project”, Bulletin Am. Met. Soc.,  99(11), 2018.  https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-17-0267.1

Stratospheric response in the first geoengineering simulation meeting multiple surface climate objectives

Richter, J. H., S. Tilmes, A. Glanville, B. Kravitz, D. G. MacMartin, M. J. Mills, I. R. Simpson, F. Vitt, J. J. Tribbia, and J.-F. Lamarque, “Stratospheric response in the first geoengineering simulation meeting multiple surface climate objectives”, Geophys. Res. A., 123:5762-5782, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD028285

Effects of different stratospheric SO2 injection altitude on stratospheric chemistry and dynamics

Tilmes, S., J. H. Richter, M. M. Mills, B. Kravitz, D. G. MacMartin, R. R. Garcia, D. E. Kinnison, J.-F. Lamarque, J. Tribbia, and F. Vitt, “Effects of different stratospheric SO2 injection altitude on stratospheric chemistry and dynamics”, J. Geophys. Res. A.  123(9): 4654-4673, 2018.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD028146

Solar Geoengineering as part of an overall strategy for meeting the 1.5°C Paris target

MacMartin, D. G., K. L. Ricke, and D. W. Keith, “Solar Geoengineering as part of an overall strategy for meeting the 1.5°C Paris target”, Phil. Trans. Royal Soc. A., 2018.  doi:10.1098/rsta.2016.0454

First simulations of designing stratospheric sulfate aerosol geoengineering to meet multiple simultaneous climate objectives

Kravitz, B., D.G. MacMartin, M. J. Mills, J. H. Richter, S. Tilmes, J.-F. Lamarque, J. J. Tribbia and F. Vitt, “First simulations of designing stratospheric sulfate aerosol geoengineering to meet multiple simultaneous climate objectives”, Geophys. Res. A., 2017. doi:10.1002/2017JD026874

The climate response to stratospheric aerosol geoengineering can be tailored using multiple injection locations

MacMartin, D.G., B. Kravitz, S. Tilmes, J.H. Richter, M.J. Mills, J.-F. Lamarque, J.J. Tribbia, and F. Vitt, “The climate response to stratospheric aerosol geoengineering can be tailored using multiple injection locations” J. Geophys. Res. A., 2017. doi: 10.1002/2017JD026868

Stratospheric dynamical response and ozone feedbacks in the presence of SO2 injections

Richter, J.H., S. Tilmes, M. M. Mills, J. Tribbia, B. Kravitz, D. G. MacMartin, F. Vitt and J.-F. Lamarque, “Stratospheric dynamical response and ozone feedbacks in the presence of SO2 injections”, J. Geophys. Res. A., 2017. doi:10.1002/2017JD026912

Older posts Newer posts

© 2024 Climate Engineering

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑