Author: Douglas MacMartin (page 2 of 9)

Sensitivity of total column ozone to stratospheric sulfur injection strategies

Tilmes, S., J.H. Richter, B. Kravitz, D.G. MacMartin, A.S. Glanville, D. Visioni, D.E. Kinnison, R. Müller (2021), “Sensitivity of total column ozone to stratospheric sulfur injection strategies”, Geophysical Research Letters, 48, e2021GL094058, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL094058

Harnessing Stratospheric Diffusion Barriers for Enhanced Climate Geoengineering

Aksamit, N.O., B. Kravitz, D.G. MacMartin, G. Haller, “Harnessing Stratospheric Diffusion Barriers for Enhanced Climate Geoengineering”, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 8845-8861, 2021.  Doi:10.5194/acp-21-8845-2021

Expanding the Design Space of Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering to Include Precipitation-Based Objectives and Explore Trade-offs

Lee, W., D.G. MacMartin, D. Visioni, B. Kravitz, “Expanding the Design Space of Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering to Include Precipitation-Based Objectives and Explore Trade-offs”, Earth Syst. Dynamics, 11, 1051-1072, 2020. Doi: 10.5194/esd-11-1051-2020

Reduced poleward transport due to stratospheric heating under geoengineering

Visioni, D., D.G. MacMartin, B. Kravitz, W. Lee, I.R. Simpson and J.H. Richter, “Reduced Poleward Transport Due to Stratospheric Heating Under Stratospheric Aerosols Geoengineering”, Geophysical Research Letters47, e2020GL089470. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL089470

An update on engineering issues concerning stratospheric aerosol injection for geoengineering

Lockley, A., D.G. MacMartin, H. Hunt, “An update on engineering issues concerning stratospheric aerosol injection for geoengineering”, Environmental Research Communications, Doi: 10.1088/2515-7620/aba944

Assessing terrestrial biogeochemical feedbacks in a strategically geoengineered climate

Yang, C.-E., F. M. Hoffman, D. M. Ricciuto, S. Tilmes, L. Xia, D. G. MacMartin, B. Kravitz, J. H. Richter, M. Mills, and J. S. Fu, “Assessing terrestrial biogeochemical feedbacks in a strategically geoengineered climate”,  Environmental Research Letters, 2020.   doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/abacf7

Reaching 1.5°C and 2.0°C global surface temperature targets using stratospheric aerosol geoengineering in CMIP6

Tilmes, S., D.G. MacMartin, J.T.M. Lenaerts, L. van Kampenhout, L. Muntjewerf, L. Xia, C.S. Harrison, K.M. Krumhardt, M. J. Mills, B. Kravitz and A. Robock, “Reaching 1.5°C and 2.0°C global surface temperature targets using stratospheric aerosol geoengineering in CMIP6”, Earth System Dynamics, 11, 1-23, 2020.  Doi: 10.5194/esd-11-1-2020

Seasonally modulated stratospheric aerosol geoengineering alters the climate outcomes

Visioni, D., D.G. MacMartin, B. Kravitz, J.H. Richter, S. Tilmes, and M.J. Mills, “Seasonally modulated stratospheric aerosol geoengineering alters the climate outcomes”, 47, e2020GL088337.   https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL088337

What goes up must come down: impacts of deposition in a sulfate geoengineering scenario

Visioni, D., E. Slessarev, D.G. MacMartin, N.M. Mahowald, C.L. Goodale, and L. Xia, “What goes up must come down: impacts of deposition in a sulfate geoengineering scenario”, ERL 15(9)Doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/ab94eb

Climate econometric models indicate solar geoengineering would reduce inter-country income inequality

Harding, A.R., K. Ricke, D. Heyen, D.G. MacMartin, and J. Moreno-Cruz,  “Climate econometric models indicate solar geoengineering would reduce inter-country income inequality”, Nature Communications, 11, 227, (2020).  doi:10.1038/s41467-019-13957-x

Older posts Newer posts

© 2024 Climate Engineering

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑