All Publications
Potential Impacts of Stratospheric Aerosol Injection on Drought Risk Managements over major River Basins in Africa
Abiodun, Babatunde J.; R. C. Odoulami; W. Sawadogo; O.A. Oloniyo; A. A. Abatan; M. New; C. Lennard; I. Pinto; T. S. Egbebiyi; D. G. MacMartin, “Potential Impacts of Stratospheric Aerosol Injection on Drought Risk Managements over major River Basins in Africa”, Climatic Change, 169, 31 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-03268-w
Sensitivity of total column ozone to stratospheric sulfur injection strategies
Tilmes, S., J.H. Richter, B. Kravitz, D.G. MacMartin, A.S. Glanville, D. Visioni, D.E. Kinnison, R. Müller (2021), “Sensitivity of total column ozone to stratospheric sulfur injection strategies”, Geophysical Research Letters, 48, e2021GL094058, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL094058
Harnessing Stratospheric Diffusion Barriers for Enhanced Climate Geoengineering
Aksamit, N.O., B. Kravitz, D.G. MacMartin, G. Haller, “Harnessing Stratospheric Diffusion Barriers for Enhanced Climate Geoengineering”, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 8845-8861, 2021. Doi:10.5194/acp-21-8845-2021
High-latitude stratospheric aerosol geoengineering can be more effective if injection is limited to spring
Lee, Walker R., D. G. MacMartin, D. Visioni, B. Kravitz: High-latitude stratospheric aerosol geoengineering can be more effective if injection is limited to spring, Geophysical Research Letters, 48, e2021GL092696, 2021. Doi: 10.1029/2021GL092696.
Comparing different generations of idealized solar geoengineering simulations in the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP)
Kravitz, B., MacMartin, D. G., Visioni, D., Boucher, O., Cole, J. N. S., Haywood, J., Jones, A., Lurton, T., Nabat, P., Niemeier, U., Robock, A., Séférian, R., and Tilmes, S.: Comparing different generations of idealized solar geoengineering simulations in the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 4231–4247, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-4231-2021, 2021.
Identifying the sources of uncertainty in climate model simulations of solar radiation modification with the G6sulfur and G6solar Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) simulations
Visioni, D., MacMartin, D. G., Kravitz, B., Boucher, O., Jones, A., Lurton, T., Martine, M., Mills, M. J., Nabat, P., Niemeier, U., Séférian, R., and Tilmes, S.: Identifying the sources of uncertainty in climate model simulations of solar radiation modification with the G6sulfur and G6solar Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) simulations,Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 10029-10063, 2021. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-10039-2021
Is Turning Down the Sun a Good Proxy for Stratospheric Sulfate Geoengineering?
2021). Is turning down the sun a good proxy for stratospheric sulfate geoengineering? Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 126, e2020JD033952. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD033952
, , & (Expanding the Design Space of Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering to Include Precipitation-Based Objectives and Explore Trade-offs
Lee, W., D.G. MacMartin, D. Visioni, B. Kravitz, “Expanding the Design Space of Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering to Include Precipitation-Based Objectives and Explore Trade-offs”, Earth Syst. Dynamics, 11, 1051-1072, 2020. Doi: 10.5194/esd-11-1051-2020
Reduced poleward transport due to stratospheric heating under geoengineering
Visioni, D., D.G. MacMartin, B. Kravitz, W. Lee, I.R. Simpson and J.H. Richter, “Reduced Poleward Transport Due to Stratospheric Heating Under Stratospheric Aerosols Geoengineering”, Geophysical Research Letters, 47, e2020GL089470. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL089470
An update on engineering issues concerning stratospheric aerosol injection for geoengineering
Lockley, A., D.G. MacMartin, H. Hunt, “An update on engineering issues concerning stratospheric aerosol injection for geoengineering”, Environmental Research Communications, Doi: 10.1088/2515-7620/aba944